Don't have a free DebtWizard account? Find out why you should

Signup to DebtWizard · Log in

3 comments so far
Why not speak your mind below

OFT needs to box clever in the Appeal Court

Page last updated Wednesday, 01 July 2009

 

001-oft-threatens-knockout-punchFive Law Lords are currently considering an appeal by the UK's main banks against an earlier decision this year by the Appeal Court that went in favour of the Office of Fair Trading, (OFT).

In an earlier hearing the Appeal Court upheld a ruling from last year that the OFT had the power to decide if bank charges were fair or not.

The banks have argued all along that their charges are fair, reasonable and legal.

The outcome of the appeal will be known later this year.

It is estimated that the banks receive around £2.5bn each year from overdraft charges when someone goes overdrawn without permission or if they have a cheque or direct payment returned unpaid.

If the banks win

If the banks win then that is virtually the end of the OFT’s case, all those campaigners and around one million individuals claiming back bank charges will be bitterly disappointed.

If the OFT win

If the OFT win then it will be the end of the first part of what is basically a two-part test case, with this victory settling the issue of whether the OFT can assess if bank charges were fair or not.  

The second part of the case will be what the OFT regard as a fair level of overdraft charges, if any. The banks’ could then challenge what the OFT recommends as a fair charge, they may decide that there should be none or very little. Whatever the OFT comes up with this may invariably lead to more rumblings in the Court. A win for the OFT could also bring about the end of free banking.

How long can I go back with my claim?

This is not clear as most experts say six years in the UK but others argue that your claim could go back as far as July 2001 which is when Financial Service Authority (FSA) issued a waiver on all Court claims.  

The standard rule is you can claim back six years, yet the FSA said the clock stopped when the hold on reclaiming started in July 2007, and this is six years before that. Although this is a ruling from the FSA it does not have backing from the Courts. So it may be worthwhile claiming back as far as July 2001 and see what happens.

This applies whether you’re in England and Wales, in Scotland it is five years but it is worth considering going for six as well because if you’re not going to use the courts, but the Ombudsman, where there’s no time limit.

Does this affect credit card charges?

No, this is completely different.

If you have already paid credit card charges then you are likely to have a claim for compensation going back as far as six years in the UK, five years and a maximun £750 if you reside in Scotland and £2,000 if you reside in Northern Ireland.

We have questions and answers plus template letters here

Our much acclaimed 'Reclaiming Credit Card Charges Tool' helps you add up your charges and creates a personalized letter to print out and send to your credit card issuer.

Vist our 'Credit Card Charges Tool' here

 

 

 

 


Speak your mind





Submit

Your comment will be moderated before it shows up.
Log in and comment to see your post appear instantaneously

Debtwizard Monday, 16 November 2009

Hi Lisa

I agree. When the court case result is known, v soon apparently, all this will mean, if the OFT win, is that the OFT can assess what is the true cost of bank charges. This will rumble on the banks will not agree, they are fighting this as they do not have any money to pay out!

It is all stalling tactics.

Are you suffering from 'financial hardship?'

If so have a look at my link re this http://www.debtwizard.com/debt...l-hardship

Best wishes

Debtwizard

Lisa Sunday, 15 November 2009 (Guest) Sunday, 15 November 2009

This is a complete joke that the customer has to go through this lengthly process to claim back their bank charges. We will be waiting years at this rate.

Niall Friday, 03 July 2009

yet again this is a kick in the guts for the customer for so many years now the banks have been taking our money unfairly . How this matter hasn't been resolved before now is beyond me as per normal the banking world gets its own way and I'm sorry to say the longer this matter persists the more i feel the customer will lose out .In the mean time the banks continue to carry on paying out there big bonuses to people who in effect have been neglectable in there managing of peoples money if this was one of us in our jobs we would be sacked as incompetent .Futher more now that the banks have now been bailed out by us the tax payers has any of us now been sent letters to say we our now shareholders no and what a shock this is another way of us the hard working tax payer being kicked in the teeth yet again


busy

Rapid Response

Continue

Related  44 more related

23/04/09
DebtWizard Update - 23 April 2009

25/05/09
OFT calls time on 'cold calling' in the debt management business

15/05/09
House repossessions figures are misleading

02/04/09
Banks win further rights to appeal OFT

Search Site

The Big List of News

If you're looking for older news from DebtWizard try searching above or viewing The Big List of News!

Mike Thomas aka the 'DebtWizard' helps individuals overcome their debt problems.

Mike writes all the articles found on this site.